U.S. Justice Department: Trump held materials on intelligence & secret human sources

Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort

The U.S. Justice Department announced on Friday that it was investigating former President Donald Trump for removing White House records because it suspected he illegally held documents involving intelligence gathering and secret human sources – among America’s most tightly guarded secrets.

The FBI conducted an extraordinary search of Trump’s Florida home on August 8 during which agents seized 11 sets of classified documents, some of which were marked “top secret” and could pose a serious threat to national security if made public, according to a heavily redacted affidavit made public by the department.

In the affidavit, an unidentified FBI agent said the agency reviewed and identified 184 documents “bearing classification markings” containing “national defense information” after Trump in January returned 15 boxes of government records sought by the U.S. National Archives. Other records in those boxes, according to the affidavit, bore handwritten notes by Trump.

The search was part of a federal investigation into whether Trump illegally removed and kept documents when he left office in January 2021 after losing the 2020 election to President Joe Biden and whether Trump tried to obstruct the probe.

Trump, a Republican who is considering another presidential run in 2024, has described the court-approved search at the Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach as politically motivated, and on Friday again described it as a “break-in.”

Advertisement ~ Scroll to continue

Documents released with the affidavit revealed that “a significant number of civilian witnesses” knowledgeable about Trump’s actions after leaving office were helping the probe, a rare disclosure.

The search was a significant escalation of one of several federal and state investigations Trump is facing involving his time in office and in private business.

The agent who drafted the affidavit wrote that after the FBI reviewed the materials Trump returned in January to the National Archives – the agency responsible for preserving government records – it had probable cause to believe more documents were still inside Mar-a-Lago.

“There is also probable cause to believe that evidence of obstruction will be found at the premises,” the agent added.

Other defense-related records Trump had returned contained references to topics including “clandestine human sources” who help U.S. intelligence-gathering, the affidavit showed, as well as details on how the nation conducts foreign surveillance and information it collected using a law that established the U.S. domestic surveillance program.

The 32-page affidavit, a sworn statement outlining evidence that gave the Justice Department probable cause to ask a judge to approve a search warrant, was heavily redacted at the department’s request. Most pages had at least some portions blacked out. Some completely blacked out. An additional six pages of documents were released with it.

FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago

The department had sought to keep the affidavit secret. But after media organizations sued to make it public U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, who approved the search warrant based on the affidavit, on Thursday ordered the release of a redacted version.

Late on Friday, Trump filed a “supplemental” motion asking the court to block the government from reviewing the documents seized at Mar-a-Lago until a third party known as a “special master” can be appointed to oversee the review.

“Judge Bruce Reinhart should NEVER have allowed the Break-In” – Trump

Trump had filed a similar motion on Monday, but U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon asked for more information about the request.

Trump’s attorneys said that their application should be granted since the affidavit was redacted “provides almost no information that would allow (Trump) to understand why the raid took place, or what was taken from his home. The few lines that are unredacted raise more questions than answers.”

Trump asked that Reinhart withdraw from the case via social media, complaining that the provided affidavit was “heavily redacted” and providing no clear justification. Such a request has not been made publicly by Trump’s legal team.

Trump stated, “Judge Bruce Reinhart should NEVER have allowed the Break-In of my home.”